Offline mode: drafts stay on this device and queued reports will send after reconnection.

How to read the evidence

From a community report to a safe public record

Every public record passes through classification, review and safety decisions. The visuals below show what the labels mean, how priorities are formed and when location details can appear.

The publication journey

Four gates between submission and publication

A submitted report stays distinct from the public record created from it.

  1. A report is received

    Community members submit an account and any supporting evidence. This information is not automatically a finding.

  2. Issues are standardised

    Issue groups and impacts are cleaned from Kobo fields. Any unresolved category stays marked “not specified.”

  3. Review and safety checks

    The review level is labelled, sensitive details are edited, and location consent is checked before public use.

  4. A public record is approved

    A separate, safety-edited record is published. It may combine relevant context from several sources.

Triage, not proof

How action priority is formed

Five submitted or derived signals are combined to help teams see where a response may be most urgent.

Priority does not measure truth.It is not an independent verification score or a legal finding.
01Submitted urgency
02Highest category severity
03Ongoing activity
04Source-reported risk
05“No action” recorded
Decision supportAction
priority
Routine · Medium · High · Critical

Read the label first

Verification labels show the level of review

Community-submitted

The record presents a submitted account that has not been independently verified.

Partially verified

Some material elements have been checked, while others remain unconfirmed.

Verified

The published record has completed the applicable verification review.

Aggregate

The record summarises patterns across multiple reports rather than one incident.

Location and suppression

Consent decides how precise a public location can be

Submitted incident GPS is considered separately from the rest of the report.

Map counts are not prevalence.Reporting access and coverage differ between places.
Decision pointExact-location publication consent recorded?
YesExact GPS may be public

Only when the public record is separately approved.

NoGeneralise or omit

The public record does not show the submitted point.

Fairness and corrections

Four safeguards around every public record

Coordination, not blame

Suggested duty bearers identify institutions that may need to coordinate a response. They are not findings of fault.

Right of reply

Named institutions receive a right of reply where policy requires it.

Visible corrections

Material corrections are versioned and explained rather than silently replaced.

Emergency takedown

Urgent removal is available when publication creates a safety risk.

Before drawing a conclusion

Check three things

  1. 1What is the verification label?
  2. 2Is the location exact, generalised or omitted?
  3. 3Does the record show a correction or reply?
Read public records